What Are the Most Useful Reliability Prediction Standards ?

 

Reliability prediction standards are essential tools for estimating the failure rates and reliability of electronic components, systems, and products. They assist engineers in designing robust systems, planning spare parts, and ensuring safety and performance. This overview covers the most widely used and relevant reliability prediction standards, all of which are supported by RAM Commander from ALD Software.

 


1. MIL-HDBK-217 (Military Handbook 217)

  • Full Name: MIL-HDBK-217F: Reliability Prediction of Electronic Equipment
  • Origin: U.S. Department of Defense
  • Purpose: Provides failure rate models for electronic components based on environmental and operational conditions.
  • Applications: Primarily used in military and aerospace sectors.
  • Pros:
    • Extensive database for military-grade components.
    • Well-established and widely recognized.
  • Cons:
    • Last updated in 1995, making it outdated for modern components.
    • Conservative failure rates that may not reflect current technology.

 

 

 


2. Telcordia SR-332 (Previously Bellcore)

  • Full Name: Telcordia SR-332: Reliability Prediction Procedure for Electronic Equipment
  • Origin: Telcordia Technologies (formerly Bellcore)
  • Purpose: Provides methods for calculating failure rates and Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF) for electronic equipment.
  • Applications: Widely used in telecommunications, networking, and commercial electronics.
  • Pros:
    • Regularly updated to include modern components.
    • Flexible models for different quality levels.
  • Cons:
    • Primarily focused on telecommunications equipment.

 

 


3. IEC 61709

  • Full Name: IEC 61709: Electrical Components - Reliability - Reference Conditions for Failure Rates and Stress Models for Conversion
  • Origin: International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC)
  • Purpose: Provides guidelines for calculating failure rates of electronic components using reference conditions and stress models.
  • Applications: Industrial electronics, consumer electronics, and automation systems.
  • Pros:
    • Flexible approach allowing the use of manufacturer-specific data.
    • Suitable for a wide range of electronic components.
  • Cons:
    • Requires detailed environmental and operational profiles.
    • Requires reference failure rates.

 

 

 


4. FIDES Guide 2022 Edition A

  • Full Name: FIDES Guide 2022 Edition A
  • Origin: Developed by a consortium of European aerospace and defense companies under the supervision of the French Ministry of Defense.
  • Purpose: Focuses on reliability prediction with an emphasis on manufacturing processes and supplier quality.
  • Applications: Aerospace, defense, and high-reliability industrial electronics.
  • Pros:
    • Considers process quality and supplier reliability.
    • Supports user defined Mission Profiles.
  • Cons:
    • Complex data requirements.
    • Limited global adoption compared to MIL-HDBK-217.

 

 

 


5. HDBK-217Plus

  • Full Name: HDBK-217Plus: Handbook of Reliability Prediction Models
  • Origin: Reliability Information Analysis Center (RIAC)
  • Purpose: An independent, modernized standard that provides reliability prediction models for electronic components, with a focus on updating failure rates to reflect the latest technological advances.
  • Applications: Military, aerospace, and high-reliability industrial applications.
  • Pros:
    • Provides more accurate models compared to MIL-HDBK-217.
    • Reflects the latest technologies and components.
  • Cons:
    • Not as widely adopted as MIL-HDBK-217.
    • Complex calculations and data requirements.

 

 

 


6. SN 29500

  • Full Name: SN 29500: Siemens Norm for Failure Rates of Electronic Components
  • Origin: Siemens AG
  • Purpose: Provides failure rate data and models specifically for electronic components used in Siemens products, with a focus on industrial automation and control systems.
  • Applications: Industrial automation, control systems, and process instrumentation.
  • Pros:
    • Tailored for industrial applications, especially Siemens products.
    • Regularly updated with real-world field data.
  • Cons:
    • Primarily focused on components used in Siemens equipment.
    • Limited applicability outside of industrial automation and Siemens-specific designs.

 

 

 


Which One is Most Useful?

  • For Military and Aerospace: MIL-HDBK-217F (legacy systems) or FIDES (modern systems).
  • For Telecommunications: Telcordia SR-332 or Siemens SN 29500
  • For Industrial and Commercial Electronics: IEC 61709 or Telcordia SR-332.
  • For High-Reliability and Aerospace Systems: FIDES Guide or 217Plus.

All of these reliability prediction standards are supported by RAM Commander from ALD Software, making it a versatile tool for engineers across various industries

 

 

 

 

WANT TO TRY RELIABILITY CALCULATION SOFTWARE?





 

 

Other ALD Software Tools

Safety Commander- Safety Commander (RAM Commander Enterprise Collaboration Edition) is the only off-the-shelf software that provides fail-safe design for any System of System Safety Assessment (SoSSA) across multiple industries, including aerospace, railway, communication, and energy. With the ability to perform safety analysis integration on the level of aircraft or system-of-systems , Safety Commander sets itself apart as a unique solution in the market.. 
D-LCC – Advanced tool for life cycle cost calculation, total ownership cost and sensitivity cost analysis. 
FavoWeb FRACAS – Web-based or cloud-based dynamic incident/failure/fault management system: FRACAS world leading.

 

See Also

ALD Reliability and Safety Software
ALD Reliability, Safety and Quality Services
Reliability&Safety Software Download